50-4 平井健之.pwd

Similar documents
AdolphWagner Bird GDP GNP GDP GNP Gupta Wagner

プリント

オーストラリア研究紀要 36号(P)☆/3.橋本

日本の商品先物市場の効率性

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)

,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (

ワールド・ワイド 10‐2(P)/3.中尾

[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2

Ishi

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 構造変化と非線形性を考慮したモデルによるわが国の歳入と歳出の因果性分析 瀧本, 太郎九州大学大学院経済学研究院 坂本, 直樹東北文化学園大学総合政策学部


43, 2, Forecasting Based Upon Cointegration Analysis and Its Applications Taku Yamamoto 80 The cointegration analysis has been a major

日本における化石燃料と経済成長の因果性分析 - 多変数アプローチに基づいて 石田葉月 Discussion Paper April 2011 Graduate School of Economics and Osaka School of International Public Pol

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦



Y-...W

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書

SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離-日本の貯蓄率低下の要因-

山形大学紀要

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

untitled

日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について:アップデートと考察

表紙_目次.PDF

02.„o“φiflì„㙃fic†j

都道府県別パネル・データを用いた均衡地価の分析: パネル共和分の応用

# _信金7月号.indb

Microsoft Word - 計量研修テキスト_第5版).doc


Microsoft Word - 計量研修テキスト_第5版).doc

Becker 1965 Gronau a a a

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

投資家の株式需要関数におけるボラティリティの限界効果と構造変化

fiúŁÄ”s‘ê‡ÌŁª”U…−…X…N…v…„…~…A…•‡Ì ”s‘ê™´›ß…−…^†[…fiŠ‚ª›Âfl’«

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right


, Exchange & Finamce

Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.228 経済時系列分析と単位根検定 : これまでの発展と今後の展望 黒住英司 December 27 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit for Statistical Analysis i

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

ウェーブレット分数を用いた金融時系列の長期記憶性の分析

_16_.indd

untitled

Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI

5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin

本組/007_倉持俊弥

untitled

082_rev2_utf8.pdf

03.Œk’ì


BB 報告書完成版_修正版) doc

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom


autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Mixed Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit

橡表紙参照.PDF

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

自 モデル 中産 研究 察 AR モデル 分 出 を 方 三 出 出 中家統計局 出 所 中価 フト フト フト 分 エネル ー際 名 質 際 調 ロ 三 中省別産 価 省固有需要 省固有供給 5 発 出 通 極 各省 CPI 3. Blanchard and Quah (989) モデル定結果 2

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

R による共和分分析 1. 共和分分析を行う 1.1 パッケージ urca インスツールする 共和分分析をするために R のパッケージ urca をインスツールする パッケージとは通常の R には含まれていない 追加的な R のコマンドの集まりのようなものである R には追加的に 600 以上のパッ

4 2 p = p(t, g) (1) r = r(t, g) (2) p r t g p r dp dt = p dg t + p g (3) dt dr dt = r dg t + r g dt 3 p t p g dt p t r t = Benefit view dp

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

_03.indd


論文08.indd

untitled

On model selection problems in terms of prediction mean squared error and interpretaion of AIC (slides)

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-

M&A の経済分析:M&A はなぜ増加したのか

, FAD FAD FED FAO FAO WFP 1999 NGO ) 1. FAD FAD 1999 Lee, FAD % national coping s

4.9 Hausman Test Time Fixed Effects Model vs Time Random Effects Model Two-way Fixed Effects Model

GDPギャップと潜在成長率


評論・社会科学 123号(P)☆/1.福田

toukei12.dvi

ミクロ・データによる家計行動分析: 将来不安と予備的貯蓄

<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>

研究シリーズ第40号

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

16

DP

第2章 経済成長と所得分配: マレーシアの事例を中心に

Hansen 1 2, Skinner 5, Augustinus 6, Harvey 7 Windle 8 Pels 9 1 Skinner 5 Augustinus 6 Pels 9 NL Harvey ML 11 NL

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI

アロー『やってみて学習』から学習:経済成長にとっての教訓 Learning from `Learning by Doing': Lessons for Economic Growth

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

(Junjiro Ogawa),,,,, 1 IT (Internet Technology) (Big-Data) IoT (Internet of Things) ECO-FORUM 2018 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1

カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )

Visit Japan Campaign OD OD 18 UNWTO 19 OD JNTO ODUNWTO 1 1

2-栗原.TXT

スプレッド・オプション評価公式を用いた裁定取引の可能性―電力市場のケース― 藤原 浩一,新関 三希代

untitled

149 (Newell [5]) Newell [5], [1], [1], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [1] 1) 2) ( ) ( ) 3) T : 2 a : 3 a 1 :

個人消費支出からみた戦間期の景気変動:LTES個人消費支出の再推計

04_田平正典.indd

Transcription:

GDP GNP Gupta 1967, Wagner and Weber 1977, Mann 1980, Abizadeh and Gray 1985, Ram 1987, Abizadeh and Yousefi 1988, Nagarajan and Spears 1990 GDP GNP GDP GNP GDP GNP Adolph Wagner Wagner 1967 Ram 1987, Biswal, Dhawan and Lee 1999 Narayan, Prasad and Singh 2008

Henrekson 1993 GDP GDP GDP Oxley 1994 Chow, Cotsomitis and Kwan 2002 Park 1996 Islam 2001 Narayan, Prasad and Singh 2008 Iniguez-Montiel 2010 Hondroyiannis and Papapetrou 1995 GDP Oxley 1994, Payne and Ewing 1996, Islam 2001, Iyare and Lorde 2004 Narayan, Prasad and Singh 2008 GDP

Anwar, Davies and Sampath 1996 Bohl 1996 G7 Payne and Ewing 1996 Chang 2002 Chang, Liu and Caudill 2004 Iyare and Lorde 2004 Abizadeh and Yousefi 1988 Abizadeh and Yousefi 1988 Narayan, Nielsen and Smyth 2008 GDP

Granger Abizadeh and Yousefi 1988 Chang 2002, Chang, Liu and Caudill 2004 Ono 2014 GDP GDP Ono 2014 GDP GDP Granger

68SNA 93SNA 68SNA 93SNA 68SNA 93SNA 93SNA

Engle and Granger 1987 Engle-Granger Gupta 1967 OLS OLS Engle and Granger 1987 OLS ADF Mann 1980 Gupta 1967 Chang 2002, Chang, Liu and Caudill 2004 Ono 2014

Granger Granger Granger Granger Granger Payne and Ewing

1996 Biswal, Dhawan and Lee 1999 Dickey and Fuller 1979, 1981 ADF Augmented Dickey-Fuller Phillips and Perron 1988 PP Phillips-Perron ADF

ADF...........................***...........*...................*.**...*...............***...................***.**.**.***.***.*.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.*.***.*.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.*.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***..***..***.***.**.***.***.***.***.*..***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.*.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***..***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.**.***. ADF AIC Akaike Information Criterion ADF MacKinnon *** ** *

PP...............................................***..............*.................................***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.*** PP PP Bartlett kernel Newey-West PP MacKinnon 1996 *** *

PP PP ADF PP PP ADF ADF ADF.. ADF.. ADF PP Choi 1992 Choi and Chung 1995 PP ADF PP

Engle-Granger Owoye 1995

Engle-Granger ADF.....***.**...*.*...*.*...**.**.**.**.**.**...**..***.***.**.**.*..**.**.......**.**...*.*.***.***

ADF..*.**.*.*.*..*.......*.*.**.**...*.*.**.*...*.**...***.***.***.***.**.*.**.**...**.* AIC ADF Engle-Granger MacKinnon 1996 *** ** *

Granger Granger.. Owoye 1995

Granger..**..***..**..**..***....**..***..***..***..***..***..***..***..**..***..**..***..***..**.............................*..*..*......**.....*..*........*....**......**............**.......***........*....**..***..*..**........**....**..*..*...

...***...*.*...*.**....***..........*..**..**..*. AIC Granger Granger *** ** * Granger Payne and Ewing 1997 Granger

Phillips and Hansen 1990 FMOLS fully modified OLS....

FMOLS.............................................................................................***..***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***.***..***.***.***.***.***.***..***.***.*** Phillips and Hansen 1990 fully modified OLS ***....

GDP GDP a b c a b

Granger Granger Grnager Granger Payne and Ewing 1997

Granger...**..**..**....***..**..***......**..*..***..*....***..***..**......***....***........**..*..***..***......**..*....***.

.***..***..**..***..*... AIC Granger Granger *** ** *

Engle-Granger

GDP.... Narayan, Nielsen and

Smyth 2008 ARDL Abizadeh, S., and J. Gray, 1985, Wagner s Law: A Pooled Time-Series, Cross-Section Comparison, National Tax Journal, Vol. 38, pp. 209218. Abizadeh, S., and M. Yousefi, 1988, An Empirical Re-Examination of Wagner s Law, Economics Letters, Vol. 26, pp. 169173. Anwar, M.S., S. Davies, and R.K. Sampath, 1996, Causality between Government Expenditures and Economic Growth: An Examination Using Cointegration Techniques, Public Finance / Finances Publiques, Vol. 51, pp. 166184. Biswal, B., U. Dhawan, and H.-Y. Lee, 1999, Testing Wagner Versus Keynes Using Disaggregated Public Expenditure Data for Canada, Applied Economics, Vol. 31, pp. 12831291. Bohl, M.T., 1996, Some International Evidence on Wagner s Law, Public Finance / Finances Publiques, Vol. 51, pp. 185200. Chang, T., 2002, An Econometric Test of Wagner s Law for Six Countries Based on Cointegration and Error-Correction Modelling Techniques, Applied Economics, Vol. 34, pp. 11571169. Chang, T., W. Liu, and S. Caudill, 2004, A Re-Examination of Wagner s Law for Ten Countries Based on Cointegration and Error-Correction Modelling Techniques, Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 14, pp. 577589. Choi, I., 1992, Effects of Data Aggregation on the Power of Tests for a Unit Root A Simulation Study, Economics Letters, Vol. 40, pp. 397401. Choi, I., and B.S. Chung, 1995, Sampling Frequency and the Power of Tests for a Unit Root: A Simulation Study, Economics Letters, Vol. 49, pp. 131136. Chow, Y.-F., J.A. Cotsomitis, and A.C.C. Kwan, 2002, Multivariate Cointegration and Causality Tests of Wagner s Hypothesis: Evidence from the UK, Applied Economics, Vol. 34, pp. 16711677. Dickey, D.A., and W.A. Fuller, 1979, Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 74,

pp. 427431. Dickey, D.A., and W.A. Fuller, 1981, Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Econometrica, Vol. 49, pp. 10571072. Engle, R.F., and C.W.J. Granger, 1987, Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing, Econometrica, Vol. 55, pp. 251276. Gupta, S.P., 1967, Public Expenditure and Economic Growth: A Time-Series Analysis, Public Finance / Finances Publiques, Vol. 22, pp. 423466. Henrekson, M., 1993, Wagner s Law A Spurious Relationship?, Public Finance / Finances Publiques, Vol. 48, pp. 406415. Hondroyiannis, G., and E. Papapetrou, 1995, An Examination of Wagner s Law for Greece: A Cointegration Analysis, Public Finance / Finances Publiques, Vol. 50, pp. 67 79. Iniguez-Montiel, A.J.,2010, Government Expenditure and National Income in Mexico: Keynes Versus Wagner, Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 17, pp. 887893. Islam, A.M.,2001, Wagner s Law Revisited: Cointegration and Exogeneity Tests for the USA, Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 8, pp. 509515. Iyare, S.O., and T. Lorde, 2004, Co-Integration, Causality and Wagner s Law: Tests for Selected Caribbean Countries, Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 11, pp. 815825. MacKinnon, J.G., 1996, Numerical Distribution Functions for Unit Root and Cointegration Tests, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 11, pp. 601618. Mann, A.J., 1980, Wagner s Law: An Econometric Test for Mexico, 19251976, National Tax Journal, Vol. 33, pp. 189201. Nagarajan, P., and A. Spears, 1990, An Econometric Test of Wagner s Law for Mexico: A Re-Examination, Public Finance / Finances Publiques, Vol. 45, pp. 165168. Narayan, P.K., I. Nielsen, and R. Smyth, 2008, Panel Data, Cointegration, Causality, and Wagner s Law: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Provinces, China Economic Review, Vol. 19, pp. 297307. Narayan, P.K., A. Prasad, and B.Singh, 2008, A Test of the Wagner s Hypothesis for the Fiji Islands, Applied Economics, Vol. 40, pp. 27932801. Ono, H., 2014, The Government Expenditure-Economic Growth Relation in Japan: An Analysis by Using the ADL Test for Threshold Cointegration, Applied Economics, Vol. 46, pp. 35233531. Owoye, O., 1995, The Causal Relationship between Taxes and Expenditures in the G7 Countries: Cointegration and Error-Correction Models, Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 2, pp. 1922. Oxley, L., 1994, Cointegration, Causality and Wagner s Law: A Test for Britain 1870 1913, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 41, pp. 286298. Park, W.K., 1996, Wagner s Law vs. Keynesian Paradigm: The Korean Experience,

Public Finance / Finances Publiques, Vol. 51, pp. 7191. Payne, J.E., and B.T. Ewing, 1996, International Evidence on Wagner s Hypothesis: A Cointegration Analysis, Public Finance / Finances Publiques, Vol. 51, pp. 258274. Payne, J.E., and B.T. Ewing, 1997, Population and Economic Growth: A Cointegration Analysis of Lesser Developed Countries, Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 4, pp. 665 669. Phillips, P.C.B., and H.R. Hansen, 1990, Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variable Regression with I1 Processes, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 57, pp. 99125. Phillips, P.C.B., and P. Perron, 1988, Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression, Biometrika, Vol. 75, pp. 335346. Ram, R., 1987, Wagner s Hypothesis in Time-Series and Cross-Section Perspectives: Evidence from Real Data for 115 Countries, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 69, pp. 194204. Wagner, A., 1967, Three Extracts on Public Finance, in R.A. Muagrave and A.T. Peacock eds., Classics in the Public Finance, New York: St. Martin s Press. Wagner, R.E., and W.E. Weber, 1977, Wagner s Law, Fiscal Institutions, and the Growth of Government, National Tax Journal, Vol. 30, pp. 5668.