Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

Similar documents
292 Vol. 44 No refundable tax credit Mirrlees 1971 Friedman

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

Ishi


表紙_目次.PDF

448 Vol. 44 No 図

untitled

Winter 2009 No Lower Earnings Limit


60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3


自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書

_16_.indd

【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85

1: 合計特殊出生率 出生率の推移 暦年 アメリカドイツフランス スウェーデン日本 Apps and Re

(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1

New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal inequality Occupy Wall Street OE

bottleneckjapanese.dvi

C. R. McKenzie ( 38 ) (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment group 1

untitled

28 Vol. 43 No. 1 2 Burchardt, Le Grand & Piachaud 1999 Bradshaw et al Gordon et al.2000 Whelan et al.2002 poverty de

橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

日本の教育経済学:実証分析の展望と課題.pdf

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

Vol.3.indb

No EITC, Earned Income Tax Credit WTC, Working Tax Credit; CTC, Child Tax Credit GSTC, Goods and Services Tax Credit a2006 b 2

財政のサステナビリティと長期金利の動向

04_田平正典.indd

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

untitled

Becker 1965 Gronau a a a

Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C

安全・安心な社会を目指して―現代社会病理の背景に関する有識者ヒアリングとりまとめ-

_03.indd

03.indd

SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離-日本の貯蓄率低下の要因-

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

アジ研教科書「マクロ安定化」.PDF

,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (

ミクロ・データによる家計行動分析: 将来不安と予備的貯蓄

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

(2005a) (2005) ( ) (2004) (2003) 3 (2003) (2003) 2

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

商学 63‐3☆/6.山本

...,..,..%,

Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr

untitled

Taro-修士論文.PDF

untitled

07-245_25.indd

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

PFI

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

2-栗原.TXT

No.14

2 3 4 II ,000 3, , ,010 3, , % (2%) ,

......,,,,,,... a OECDa IS Islamic State

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析


冷戦後の戦略環境変化とクリントン政権

時間割引:双曲割引と弱加法性

ケインズ『お金の改革論』山形浩生訳 Keynes, A Tract on Monetary Reform, 1923, Japanese translation Hiroo Yamagata 2015

橡motonishi.PDF

小塚匡文.indd

所得税と課税最低限に関する一考察


JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research Understanding Inflation Dynamics of the Japanese Economy Working Paper Series No.7 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロ

Masanori Hashimoto Rene Fahr and Hilmar Schneider 1. Hashimoto, Masanori Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider Hashimoto, Masanori 2004 Fahr

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

(Information Technology )

K


<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>

BI BI BI BI Tinbergen, Basic Income Research Group 92 Citizen s Income Research Group 2 Basic Income Earth Network BIEN 1 BIJN BIEN Bas


The Effects of Tax Revenue by Deductions of National Income Tax and Individual Inhabitants Tax The national income tax and individual inhabitants tax

さぬきの安全2016-cs5-出力.indd

看護学科案内'16/表紙

Autumn

産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

untitled

s Government of India, Ministry of Labour d Weiner 16


†sŸ_Ł¶†t„µŠlŁª(P2†`P24)/‘ã−C”s‡É‡¨‡¯‡éfiñ‘dŸJfiŁ”s‘ê‡Ì”À‘Ø„¤‰ƒ

Microsoft Word - 【最終稿】國枝.docx

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

DP

公的年金制度の考え方と抜本改革の方向性.pdf


生活設計レジメ

44 4 I (1) ( ) (10 15 ) ( 17 ) ( 3 1 ) (2)

I II III 28 29


shuron.dvi

和RIM25_三浦氏.indd

Transcription:

266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001

Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2 1 1980 OECD OECD 5 3 2 50 65 3 4 3 4 2000 OECD 20 2000 OECD 2003

268 Vol. 44 No. 3 図 3 1 3 10 65 18 18 1 5 2 7 2 9 3 III 限界税率と保険料率の現状 II 3 1 t c y t(y) y 1 c

Winter 08 269 図 4 T (y) y 2 T (y) 2 1 T (y) 3 t 4 54 1. 8 1 2 2008 4 T (y) 4 4 5 900

270 Vol. 44 No. 3 図 5 T (y) 14. 996 0 1, 700 2 1 1 2 5 2 20 40 3 5 6 1 2 7 6 7 8, 339 0 8, 339 83 8 4 5

Winter 08 271 図 6 図 7 100 9 10 24 5 1 11 4 7 900 660 894 726 894

272 Vol. 44 No. 3 2 12 IV 望ましい所得再分配政策 1 最高税率 IV III Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 T を 5 5 3 e 13 y f( y) F( y) yf( y)/(1 F( y)) y 6 7 a Pareto index a G( y) G( y) 0 8 2 2007 2 パレート指標 1979 1977 1. 3 1987 1975 1982 3 a 2. 176 2. 743 2007 1987 2. 5406 a ȳ 9 y m /ȳ 1997 2000 2003 14 y m /ȳ 8 10 5, 000 3 1997 2000 2003 3 2, 000 1. 5 Saez 2001

Winter 08 273 図 8 y y 1997 図 9 y y 2000 図 10 y y 2003

274 Vol. 44 No. 3 2003 1. 5 y m /ȳ 1. 7 a 2. 4 Feenberg and Poterba 1993 1951 1990 a 1970 2. 5 1980 1. 5 15 Saez 2001 1992 1993 a 2 Saez 2004 Piketty and Saez 2003 a 1. 6 a a 3 労働供給の弾力性 2005 2004 2002 0. 108 Pencavel 1986 0. 1 Lindsey 1987 Lindsey 1987 Feldstein 1995 1 Gruber and Saez 2002 Saez 20010. 25 0. 5 2 Saez 2004 0. 5 2005 2 0. 2 a 2. 5 e 0. 2 67 2007 50 Diamond 1998 Saez 2001 4 低所得者の税率 Saez 2002 Saez 2002 19982000 2003 2006

Winter 08 275 V 結論 III 40 900 660 894 726 894 420 540 40 2, 300 50 50 Kaplow 2008 付 記 1211006 注 1 2006 2008 Hamaaki and Iwamoto

276 Vol. 44 No. 3 2008 2 1 3 10 114. 4 220 4 2007 5 1 1 3 2 6 2 1 6 20 40 3 5 3 33 29 4 7 8 100 2007 2006 9 6 7 10 11 322, 848 1, 189, 320 317, 784 5, 064 322, 848 866, 472 513, 386 12 4 13 14 Gross income 15 Feenberg and Poterba 1993 a 1 Diamond 1998 a 参考文献 1979 2006 42 3 12 pp. 204 218 2008 2000

Winter 08 277 50 3 7 pp. 220 231 2007 4 pp. 69 82 2003 46 3 8 pp. 107 126 2007 26 9 pp. 31 43 2006 2006 pp. 323 341 2005 128 12 pp. 19 34 2004 No. 113 1987 38 2 4 pp. 130 138 2005 No. 05A 04 1998 34 1 6 pp. 90 102 Diamond, Peter A. (1998), Optimal Income Taxation: An Example with a U Shaped Pattern of Optimal Marginal Tax Rates, American Economic Review, Vol. 88, No. 1, March, pp. 83 95. Feenberg, Daniel R., and James M. Poterba (1993), Income Inequality and the Incomes of Very High Income Taxpayers: Evidence from Tax Returns, in James M. Poterba ed., Tax Policy and the Economy 7, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 145 177. Feldstein, Martin (1995), The Effect of marginal Tax Rates on Taxable Income: A Panel Study of the 1986 Tax Reform Act, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 103, No. 3, June, pp. 551 572. Forster, Michael, and Marco Mira d Ercole (2005), Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries in the Second Half of the 1990s, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper No. 22. Gruber, Jon and Emmanuel Saez (2002), The Elasticity of Taxable Income: Evidence and Implications, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 84, No. 1, April, pp.1 32. Hamaaki, Junya., and Yasushi Iwamoto (2008) A reappraisal of the Incidence of Employer Contributions to Social Security in Japan, CIRJE Discussion Paper, F 569. Kaplow, Louis (2008), The Theory of Taxation and Public Economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Lindsey, Lawrence B. (1987), Individual Taxpayer R e s p o n s e t o T a x C u t s : 1 9 8 2 1 9 8 4 w i t h Implications for the Revenue maximizing Tax Rate, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 33, No. 2, July, pp. 173 206. Mirrlees, J. A. (1971), An Exploration in the Theory of the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 38, No. 114, April, pp. 175 208. Pencavel, John (1986), Labor Supply of Men: A Survey, in Orley Aschenfelter and Richard Layard eds., Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 3 102. Piketty, Thomas, and Emmanuel Saez (2003), Income Inequality in The United States, 1913 1998, Quarterly Journal of Economics, February Vol. 118, Issue 1, February, pp. 1 39. Saez, Emmanuel (2001), Using Elasticities to Derive Optimal Income Tax Rates, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 68, No. 1, January, pp. 205 229. (2002), Optimal Income Transfer Programs: Intensive versus Extensive Labor Supply Responses, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 117, Issue 3, pp. 1039 1073. (2004), Reported Incomes and Marginal Tax Rates, 1960 2000: Evidence and Policy Implications, in James M. Poterba ed., Tax Policy and the Economy 18, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 117 173.