c (y it 2 y it 3 ) y it 2 y it 3 (y it 1 y it 2 ) 4 Arellano and Bond (1991) Ahn and Schmidt (1995) 2 y 5 E[y is, (ν it ν it 1 )] = 0, s =0, 1,

Similar documents
わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

(p.2 ( ) 1 2 ( ) Fisher, Ronald A.1932, 1971, 1973a, 1973b) treatment group controll group (error function) 2 (Legendre, Adrian

都道府県別パネル・データを用いた均衡地価の分析: パネル共和分の応用

untitled

seminar0220a.dvi

Hsiao (2003, 6 ) Maddala, Li, Trost and Joutz (1997) Hsiao and Pesaran (2004) 4.2 y it = γy it 1 + x itβ + ε it i = 1, 2,..., N t = 1, 2,...T (

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

フィナンシャルレビュー 第80号

Ishi

µ i ν it IN(0, σ 2 ) 1 i ȳ i = β x i + µ i + ν i (2) 12 y it ȳ i = β(x it x i ) + (ν it ν i ) (3) 3 β 1 µ i µ i = ȳ i β x i (4) (least square d

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

Mantel-Haenszelの方法

50-4 平井健之.pwd

2 Tobin (1958) 2 limited dependent variables: LDV 2 corner solution 2 truncated censored x top coding censor from above censor from below 2 Heck

オーストラリア研究紀要 36号(P)☆/3.橋本

最小2乗法

4 2 p = p(t, g) (1) r = r(t, g) (2) p r t g p r dp dt = p dg t + p g (3) dt dr dt = r dg t + r g dt 3 p t p g dt p t r t = Benefit view dp

研究シリーズ第40号


082_rev2_utf8.pdf

ウェーブレット分数を用いた金融時系列の長期記憶性の分析

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

X X X Y R Y R Y R MCAR MAR MNAR Figure 1: MCAR, MAR, MNAR Y R X 1.2 Missing At Random (MAR) MAR MCAR MCAR Y X X Y MCAR 2 1 R X Y Table 1 3 IQ MCAR Y I

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI

80 X 1, X 2,, X n ( λ ) λ P(X = x) = f (x; λ) = λx e λ, x = 0, 1, 2, x! l(λ) = n f (x i ; λ) = i=1 i=1 n λ x i e λ i=1 x i! = λ n i=1 x i e nλ n i=1 x

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ

dvi

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)

Microsoft Word - 計量研修テキスト_第5版).doc

, 1), 2) (Markov-Switching Vector Autoregression, MSVAR), 3) 3, ,, , TOPIX, , explosive. 2,.,,,.,, 1

ヒストリカル法によるバリュー・アット・リスクの計測:市場価格変動の非定常性への実務的対応

fiúŁÄ”s‘ê‡ÌŁª”U…−…X…N…v…„…~…A…•‡Ì ”s‘ê™´›ß…−…^†[…fiŠ‚ª›Âfl’«

4.9 Hausman Test Time Fixed Effects Model vs Time Random Effects Model Two-way Fixed Effects Model

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-


03.Œk’ì

カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )

Isogai, T., Building a dynamic correlation network for fat-tailed financial asset returns, Applied Network Science (7):-24, 206,

x T = (x 1,, x M ) x T x M K C 1,, C K 22 x w y 1: 2 2

Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Mixed Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit

橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

2 1,2, , 2 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) Cameron and Trivedi(1998) , (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003)

02.„o“φiflì„㙃fic†j

Microsoft Word - 計量研修テキスト_第5版).doc

untitled

( ) (, ) arxiv: hgm OpenXM search. d n A = (a ij ). A i a i Z d, Z d. i a ij > 0. β N 0 A = N 0 a N 0 a n Z A (β; p) = Au=β,u N n 0 A

.. est table TwoSLS1 TwoSLS2 GMM het,b(%9.5f) se Variable TwoSLS1 TwoSLS2 GMM_het hi_empunion totchr

untitled

autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)

推定モデル

山形大学紀要

日本統計学会誌, 第44巻, 第2号, 251頁-270頁

10:30 12:00 P.G. vs vs vs 2

DP

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

Masanori Hashimoto Rene Fahr and Hilmar Schneider 1. Hashimoto, Masanori Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider Hashimoto, Masanori 2004 Fahr

早稲田大学現代政治経済研究所 ダブルトラック オークションの実験研究 宇都伸之早稲田大学上條良夫高知工科大学船木由喜彦早稲田大学 No.J1401 Working Paper Series Institute for Research in Contemporary Political and Ec

わが国企業による株主還元策の決定要因:配当・自社株消却のインセンティブを巡る実証分析

1 (1997) (1997) 1974:Q3 1994:Q3 (i) (ii) ( ) ( ) 1 (iii) ( ( 1999 ) ( ) ( ) 1 ( ) ( 1995,pp ) 1

Talk 2. Local asymptotic power of self-weighted GEL method and choice of weighting function Kouchi International Seminar on Recent Developments of Qua

講義のーと : データ解析のための統計モデリング. 第5回

, Exchange & Finamce

( β K ) p β W W p β K K aβ β W W β β K K ) 1/(βW +β K ) 3 ln C =lnα + 1 β W + β K ln Q (3) 1/(β W + β K ) ( β W + β K ) 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( 1998

28

橡表紙参照.PDF


Preliminary Version Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Me

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

untitled

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察


Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C

(pdf) (cdf) Matlab χ ( ) F t

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

1990年代以降の日本の経済変動

21世紀の統計科学 <Vol. III>

149 (Newell [5]) Newell [5], [1], [1], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [1] 1) 2) ( ) ( ) 3) T : 2 a : 3 a 1 :

磁性物理学 - 遷移金属化合物磁性のスピンゆらぎ理論

Becker 1965 Gronau a a a

ばらつき抑制のための確率最適制御

ohpmain.dvi

AR(1) y t = φy t 1 + ɛ t, ɛ t N(0, σ 2 ) 1. Mean of y t given y t 1, y t 2, E(y t y t 1, y t 2, ) = φy t 1 2. Variance of y t given y t 1, y t

第11回:線形回帰モデルのOLS推定

,,,

J-LEAGUE 8000 V.Kawasaki Urawa.R 5000 J-LEAGUE

ミクロ・データによる家計行動分析: 将来不安と予備的貯蓄

..,,...,..,...,,.,....,,,.,.,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,,.,,,.,,,,.,,, Becker., Becker,,,,,, Becker,.,,,,.,,.,.,,

TERG

Y-...W

[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2

Law and Economics Review vol.4,no.1(february 2009) 1998

% 10%, 35%( 1029 ) p (a) 1 p 95% (b) 1 Std. Err. (c) p 40% 5% (d) p 1: STATA (1). prtesti One-sample test of pr

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL

kubostat2017b p.1 agenda I 2017 (b) probability distribution and maximum likelihood estimation :

43, 2, Forecasting Based Upon Cointegration Analysis and Its Applications Taku Yamamoto 80 The cointegration analysis has been a major

BB 報告書完成版_修正版) doc


Transcription:

c 2000 1 6.1 y it = δy it 1 + x 0 itβ + u it i =1, 2,..., N t =1, 2,...T (1) δ x 0 it K β K u it u it = µ i + ν it (2) µ i IID(0, σµ) 2, ν it IID(0, σν) 2 u it N T 1 v it Anderson and Hsiao (1981) Arellano(1989) Hahn,Hausman and Kuerteiner (2002) Arellano and Bond (1991) Ahn and Schmidt (1995) GMM 2 (19) µ i y it y it 1 =(x it x it 1 ) 0 β + δ(y it 1 y it 2 )+(ν it ν it 1 ) (3) v it 3 1 4.3 2 Arellano and Bover (1995), Blundell and Bond (1998) 3 y it 1 ν it 1 19 1

c 2000 2 (y it 2 y it 3 ) y it 2 y it 3 (y it 1 y it 2 ) 4 Arellano and Bond (1991) Ahn and Schmidt (1995) 2 y 5 E[y is, (ν it ν it 1 )] = 0, s =0, 1,...t 2, t =2,...T (4) GMM) 1 P n i=1 n y is[(y it y it 1 ) (x it x it 1 ) 0 β δ(y it 1 y it 2 )] = 0 (5) s =0,..., t 2, t =2,..., T Ahn and Schmidt(1995) y y (ν it ν it 1 ) ( ) E[y is (ν is+1 ν is ) y is+1 (ν is+2 ν is+1 )] = 0 (6) E[(y it x it 0 β)y it (y it 1 x it 1 0 β)y it 1 ]=0 (7) t =2,...T Binder, Hsiao, and Pesaran (2000) Hsiao, Pesaran and Tahmiscioglu (2002) Hsiao (2002) GMM GMM T=5 N=50 2500 1 GMM 15 20 GMM Hsiao, Pesaran and Tahmiscioglu (2002) Fujiki, Hsiao and Shen (2002) (Minimum Distance Estimation: MDE) 6 4 Arellano(1989) y it 2 y it 3 5 (orthogonality conditions) Holtz-Eakin(1988) Holtz-Eakin, Newey and Rosen(1988) 6 MDE Lee(2002,Chap3) 2

c 2000 3 2 (β, δ) P min[ N 4νi Ω 1 4νi ] (8) i=1 Ω 4νi 4νi = [4y i1 β4x i1 δ4y i0, 4y i2 β4x i2 δ4y i1,...] N MDE GMM MDE GMM Hahn, Hausman and Kuersteiner (2002) y n y n 3 (long differences;ld) (MDE) Arellano and Bond (1991) Kiviet (1995) Ziliak 1997 Blundell and Bond (1998) Alonso-Borrego and Arellano (1999) GMM GMM N Blundell, Bond and Windmeijer(2000) GMM GMM 6.2 spurious Levin-Lin (LL) test(1992,1993) Im-Pesaran-Shin (IPS) test(1997) Maddala-Wu (MW) test (1999) 3

c 2000 4 y it = ρy it 1 + e it i =1, 2,...N (9) t H 0 : ρ 1 =1 vs H 1 : ρ 1 < 1 (10) Levin-Lin (LL) test H 0 : ρ 1 = ρ 2 =... = ρ N = ρ =1 vs H 1 : ρ 1 = ρ 2 =... = ρ < 1 (11) O Connell(1998) Levin-Lin test Im-Pesaran-Shin (IPS) test Levin-Lin test H 0 : ρ i =1for all i vs H 1 : ρ i < 1 at least one i Maddala (2001, p.554) N Levin-Lin test Augmented Dickey-Fuller test N t M σ 2 t t M σ 2 /N Maddala-Wu test N Ronald A. Fisher (1973a) P i i P λ = 2 P N i=1 log e P i 2N χ N P λ test Maddala and Wu (1999) Fisher Choi(1999a) Fisher Fisher 4

c 2000 5 6.3 7 y it i t p it E(y it )=1 p it +0 (1 p it )=p it (x it ) p it =Pr[y it =1]=E(y it x it )=F (x 0 itβ) (12) F (x 0 itβ) F (x 0 itβ) =Φ(x 0 itβ) = xz 0 it β 0 ex it β 1 2π e u2 /2 du (13) F (x 0 itβ) = (14) 1+e x0 it β y it = x0 it β + u it. y it =1 if yit > 0 (15) y it =0 if yit 6 0 Pr[y it =1]=Pr[y it > 0]=Pr[u it > x 0 itβ] =F (x 0 itβ) (16) 7 Maddala(1983 1987) Gourieroux (2000) Lee (2002) Maltinominal logit, ordered probit, sequential Tobit Count data 5

c 2000 6 6.3.1 µ i yit = x 0 itβ + µ i + ν it (17) Pr[y it =1]=Pr[yit > 0] = Pr[ν it > x 0 itβ µ i ]=F(x 0 itβ + µ i ) (18) T µ i N µ i T 8 µ i β 9 Chamberlain (1980) µ i P T t=1 y it β L c = N Q i=1 Pr(y i1,...y it P T t=1 y it) (19) β µ i Chamberlin Hausman χ 2 Chamberlin 10 Liang and Zeger (1986) Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) Population-averaged Model 8 Neyman and Scott (1948) (the classical incidental parameter problem) Lancaster (2000) 9 Hsiao(2002) β µ i β 10 N T Heckman (1981b) 6

c 2000 7 6.3.2 11 yit = x 0 itβ + µ i + ν it ν it IIN(0, σν) 2 (20) y it = y it if y it > 0 (21) y it =0 otherwise d it =1 if yit > 0, d it =0 otherwise LogL = P i,t (1 d it )LogΦ( x itβ µ i )+ P d it { 1 σ i,t 2 log σ2 1 2σ (y 2 it x 0 it β µ i) 2 } (22) β σ µ i µ i T β σ Heckman and MaCurdy (1980) (iterative methods) 12 β σ µ i β σ β σ β σ Honoré(1992) 62 b = β u ist (b) =max{y is, (x is x it )b} max{0, (x is x it )b} (23) u ist (β) =max{y is, (x is x it )β} max{0, (x is x it )β} (24) =max{µ i + ν it, x is β, x it β} max{ x is β, x it β} 11 Hausman and Wise (1979) 12 µ i 1980, P.59) 7

c 2000 8 u ist (β) s t ν it i.i.d. u ist (β) u its (β) i.i.d. E[(ξ(ψ(u its (β) ψ(u ist (β)))) x it,µ i ]=0 (25) β N β 6.4 attrition (weighted least square=wls) (self-selection resones) 13 ANOVA( ) 14 (ML) 15 ANOVA 13 (New Jersey) Gary Hausman and Wise (1979) 14 ANOVA (Searle (1971) Townsend and Searle (1971) Wallace and Hussain (1969) Swamy and Arora (1972) Fuller and Battese (1974) Henderson (1953) 15 Jennrich and Sampson (1976) Harville (1977) Das (1979) Corbeil and Searle (1976a,b) Hocking (1985) 8

c 2000 9 Townsend and Searle (1971) Baltagi and Chang (1994) ANOVA ANOVA (variance component ratio) 16 [1] Ahn, S.C. and Schmidt, P. (1995) Efficient Estimation of Models for Dynamic Panel Data, Journal of Econometrics, 68, pp.5-28. [2] Alonso-Borrego,C. and Arellano,M.(1999) Symmetrically Normalized Instrumental-variable Estiantion Using Panel Data, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 17, pp.36-49. [3] Anderson, T.W. and Hsiao, C. (1981) Estimation of Dynamic Models with Error Components, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, pp.598-606. [4] Arellano, M. (1989) A Note on the Anderson-Hsiao Estimator for Panel Data, Economics Letters, 31, pp.337-341. [5] Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991) Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations, Review of Economic Studies, 58, pp.277-297. 16 9

c 2000 10 [6] Arellano, M. and Bover, O. (1995) Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-components Models, Journal of Econometrics, 68, pp.29-52. [7] Baltagi, B.H. and Y.J. Chang (1994) Incomplete Panels: A Comparative Study of Alternative Estimators for the Unbalanced One-Way Error Components Regression Model, Journal of Econometrics, 62, pp.67-89. [8] Binder, M., C. Hsiao and M.H. Pesaran (2000) Estimation and Inference in Short Panel Vector Autoregression with Unit Roots and Cointegration, mimeo. [9] Blundell, R. and Bond, S. (1998) Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models, Journal of Econometrics, 87, pp.115-143. [10] Blundell, R., S. Bond and F. Windmeijer (2000) Estimation in Dynamic Panel Data Models: Improving on the Performance of the Standard GMM Estimator, Advances in Econometrics 15, pp.53-91. [11] Chamberlain, G. (1980) Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data, Review of Economic Studies, 47, pp.225-238. [12] Choi, I. (1999a) Unit Root Tests for Panel Data, Working Paper, Department of Economics, Kookmin University, Korea. [13] Corbeil, R.R. and S.R. Searle (1976a) A Comparison of Variance Component Estimators, Biometrics, 32, pp.779-791. [14] Corbeil, R.R. and S.R. Searle (1976b) Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML), Estimation of Variance Components in the Mixed Model, Technometrics 18, pp.31-38.das, K. (1979) Asymptotic Optimality of Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimates for the Mixed Model, Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin 28, pp.125-142. [15] Das, K. (1979) Asymptotic Optimality of Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimates for the Mixed Model, Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin 28, pp.125-142. [16] Fisher, R.A.(1973a) Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 14th ed, New York: Hafner Publishing. [17] Fujiki, H., C. Hsiao, and Y. Shen.(2002) Is There a Stable Money Demand Function under the Low Interest Rate Policy? A Panel Data Analysis, Monetary and Economic Studies, 20(2), pp.1-23. 10

c 2000 11 [18] Fuller, W.A. and G.E. Battese (1974) Estimation of Linear Models with Cross-Error Structure, Journal of Econometrics, 2, pp.67-78. [19] Gourieroux, C. (2000) Econometrics of Qualitative Dependent Variables, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [20] Hahn,J., Hausman, J. and Kuersteinerm G.(2002) Bias Corrected Instrumental Variables Estimation for Dynamic Panel Models with Fixed Effects, MIT, mimeo. [21] Harville, D.A. (1977) Maximum Likelihood Approaches to Variance Component Estimation and to Related Problems, Journal of the American Statistical Association 72, pp.320-340. [22] Hausman, J.A. and D. Wise (1979) Attrition Bias in Experimental and Panel Data: the Gary Income Maintenance Experiment, Econometrica, 47, pp.455-473. [23] Heckman, J.J. (1981b) The Incidental Parameters Problem and the Problem of Initial Conditions in Estimating a Discrete time-discrete Data Stochastic Process, in C.F. Manski and D. McFadden (eds.), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, MIT Press, Cambridge. [24] Heckman, J.J. and T.E. MaCurdy (1980) A Life-Cycle Model of Female Labor Supply, Review of Economic Studies, 52, pp.681-690. [25] Henderson, C.R., Jr. (1953) Estiation of Variance Components, Biometrics, 9, pp.226-252. [26] Hocking, R.R. (1985) The Analysis of Linear Models, Monterey: Brooks/Cole Company. [27] Holtz-Eakin,D.(1988) Testing for Individual Effects in Autoregressive Models, Journal of Econometrics, 39, pp.297-307. [28] Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W. and Rosen, H.S. (1988) Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data, Econometrica, 56, pp.1371-1395. [29] Honoré, B.E. (1992) Trimmed LAD and Least Squares Estimation of Truncated and Censored Regression Models with Fixed Effects, Econometrica, 60, pp.533-565. [30] Hsiao, C. (2002) Analysis of Panel Data 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 11

c 2000 12 [31] Hsiao, C., M.H. Pesaran and A.K. Tahmiscioglu (2002) Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Fixed Effects Dynamic Panel Data Models Covering Short Time Periods, Jounral of Econometrics, 109, pp.107-150. [32] Im, K., M.H. Pesaran and Y. Shin (1997) Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels, Econometrica, forthcoming. [33] Jenrich, R.I. and P.F. Sampson (1976) Newton-Raphson and Related Algorithms for Maximum Likelihood Variance Component Estimation, Technometrics 18, pp.11-17. [34] Kiviet, H.H. (1995) On Bias Inconsistency and Efficiency in Various Estimators of Dynamic Panel Data Models, Journal of Econometrics, 68, pp.53-78. [35] Lancaster, T. (2000) The Incidental Parameter Problem Since 1948, Journal of Econometrics 95, pp.391-413. [36] Lee, M.J.(2002) Panel Data Econometrics: Methods-of-Moments and Limited Dependent Variables, San Diego: Academic Press. [37] Levin, A. and C.F. Lin (1992) Unit Root Test in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties, Discussion Paper #92-93 (University of California at San Diego). [38] Levin, A. and C.F. Lin (1993) Unit Root Test in Panel Data: New Results, Discussion Paper #93-56 (University of California at San Diego). [39] Liang, K.Y. and S.L. Zeger (1986) Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Generalized Linear Models, Biometrika 73, pp.13-22. [40] Maddala, G.S. (1983) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [41] Maddala, G.S. (1987) Limited Dependent Variable Models Using Panel Data, The Journal of Human Resources, 22, pp.307-338. [42] Maddala, G.S. and Wu, S.(1999) A Comparative Study of Panel Data Unit Root Tests and a New Simple Test, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, pp.631-652. [43] Neyman, J. and E.L. Schott (1948) Consistent Estimates Based on Partially Consistent Observations, Econometrica, 16, pp.1-32. 12

c 2000 13 [44] Searle, S.R. (1971) Linear Models, Wiley, New York. [45] Swamy, P.A.V.B. and S.S. Arora (1972) The Exact Finite Sample Properties of the Estimators of Coefficients in the Error Components Regression Models, Econometrica, 40, pp.261-275. [46] Townsend, E.C. and S.R. Searle (1971) Best Quadratic Unbiased Estimation of Variance Components from Unbalanced Data in the One- Way Classification, Biometrics 27, pp.643-657. [47] Wallace, T.D. and A. Hussain (1969) The Use of Error Components Models in Combining Cross-Section and time-series Data, Econometrica, 37, pp.55-72. [48] Ziliak,J.P. 1997 Efficient Estimation with Panel Data When Instruments are Predetermined: An Empirical Comparison of Moment- Condition Estimators, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 15, pp.419-431. 13