D F I CP (equity finance) CP (debt finance) ( )

Similar documents
株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

2 / 24

Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C

M&A の経済分析:M&A はなぜ増加したのか

季刊 企業と法創造 第1巻第4号(通巻第4号)

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務



濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

非上場企業におけるコーポレート・ガバナンス

【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背

untitled

1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr

<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>

1990年代以降の日本の経済変動

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL

headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて


デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程


6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21

( β K ) p β W W p β K K aβ β W W β β K K ) 1/(βW +β K ) 3 ln C =lnα + 1 β W + β K ln Q (3) 1/(β W + β K ) ( β W + β K ) 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( 1998

bottleneckjapanese.dvi

36巻目次.indd

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

23_02.dvi

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ

DP

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

Y-...W

導入

, 3, 1999, 4,,

A5 PDF.pwd

物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓

日本の教育経済学:実証分析の展望と課題.pdf

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)

(EHChamberlin) (ESMason) (JSBain) (RECaves) (CKaysen) (DFTurner) (FMScherer) (1) - (2) (1) (Structure) (2) (Conduct) (3) (Performance) (S

中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 2012 年 3 月 審査論文 1 Keywords: JEL Classi cation: L13, L22, L33 1 * *1 Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (2009) Mukherjee and Suestrong

坪沼

New Public Management NPM Walsh Leibenstein, H. X Leibenstein1966 Leibenstein1969 X X X X Blois ue

1 1 1 [2000]

橡motonishi.PDF

GDPギャップと潜在成長率


Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

fiúŁÄ”s‘ê‡ÌŁª”U…−…X…N…v…„…~…A…•‡Ì ”s‘ê™´›ß…−…^†[…fiŠ‚ª›Âfl’«

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

untitled

OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br

RIETI Highlight VOL.25

2

59-1・2 鳥居昭夫・春日教測 .pwd

C. R. McKenzie ( 38 ) (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment group 1

I- Fama-French 3, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- 1 I- I- Jensen Fama-French 3 SMB-FL, HML-FL I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth I- S


autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)


ミクロ・データによる家計行動分析: 将来不安と予備的貯蓄


untitled

Law and Economics Review vol.4,no.1(february 2009) 1998

国際学研究 2‐1☆/目次(2‐1)

_16_.indd

論文08.indd

# _信金7月号.indb


産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

表紙_目次.PDF

本文.indd

2 DEA Bain Mann Strickland and Weiss Structure Conduct Performance S-C-P Brozen Demsetz

ワールド・ワイド 10‐2(P)/3.中尾


aragciv54mac.dvi


02.„o“φiflì„㙃fic†j

財政のサステナビリティと長期金利の動向

本邦株式市場の流動性に関する動学的考察―東京証券取引所のティック・データ分析―

バーリ&ミーンズの株式会社論

IT 投資は日本経済を活性化させるか-JIP データベースを利用した国際比較と実証分析-.PDF

日本における財政政策のインパクトー1990年代のイベント・スタディー

アロー『やってみて学習』から学習:経済成長にとっての教訓 Learning from `Learning by Doing': Lessons for Economic Growth

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

SUSENAS Kor Modul (2) (3) (4)

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85

Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Mixed Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit

* 積極的労働市場政策と若年雇用 山本勲野原快太 DD DD

Becker 1965 Gronau a a a

_03.indd

Vol.8 No (July 2015) 2/ [3] stratification / *1 2 J-REIT *2 *1 *2 J-REIT % J-REIT J-REIT 6 J-REIT J-REIT 10 J-REIT *3 J-

untitled

(2000) ( ) (2000) 2

Transcription:

1990 2001 2 26 1 1990 1990 1

1992 4 D F I 50 3 26000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 CP (equity finance) CP (debt finance) 1960 1995 ( ) 1970 60 2

1970 1990 85 CP (disintermediation) 1995-1998 BIS Hoshi et al (1991) 1990 3

3 Berle and Means (1932) (Shleifer and Vishny (1997)) 2000 1997 1999 Tirole(2001) 1 Tirole 2 1997-1998 59 / 32 16 87 3 1 Allen and Gale(2000) 2 Tirole(2001) 1 2 3 (1996 pp.131-134) 4

3.1 (take-over bid: TOB) 4 0.954 0.417 0.623 0.632 1 1.6-2.4 0.095 4 TOB 5

1990 / / ROE 3.2 6

5 2 3.1 5 Fama(1985) 7

/ : LiquidityRatio / DebtEquityRatio / DebtAssetRatio 4 1990 1990 IT 24 4.1 Nickell (1996) 8

Nickell(1996) Allen and Gale (2000) ln Y it = α + β ln K it + γ ln L it + δdebt/asset it + η(debt/asset it ) 2 +θowncapratio it + λh erf indahlindex it + µsalesshare it +νliquidityratio it +ξdebt/equity it +ɛ it (1) Y = K L= Debt/Asset= (Debt/Asset) 2 = OwnCapRatio H erf indahlindex= - SalesShare LiquidityRatio Debt/Equity - - 4.2 9

Nickell (1995) Funke, Wolf and Holger (1999) ln L ti =α+β ln L t 1i +γ ln Y ti +ϕ ln w ti +δdebt/asset it +η(debt/asset it ) 2 +θowncapratio it + λh erf indahlindex it + µsalesshare it +νliquidityratio it +ξdebt/equity it +ε ti (2) L Y w= (= / ) (1) 4.3 6 / ln I it = α + β ln I it 1 + γ ln Y it 1 + φ ln K it 1 + δcap/asset it +νliquidityratio it + ηdebt/asset it + µsalesshare it + ɛ it (3) I Cap/Asset / (1) 6 Hayashi and Inoue (1991) 1998 2001 10

5 50 26000 33 4 2 5 7 1992 1995 1996 1997 1998 5 1992 1995 1998 4 1995 1998 4 3 7 2 Herfindahl-Hirschuman Index / : LiquidityRatio / / 1 / : OwnCapRatio Shareholder scapitalratio / DebtEquityRatio / Re turnonequity, ROE / DebtAssetRatio 4 7 11

Herfindahl-Hirschuman Index 5.1 5 1.034 (constant return to scale) 2 2 (Panel1-3) 1 1990 t robustness Nickell(1996) 12

Herfindahl-Hirschuman Index 5.2 6 (1996) 0.623 0.095 1995-98 Herfindahl-Hirschuman Index t R 2 0.97 4 0.79 13

Herfindahl-Hirschuman Index Panel2 Herfindahl-Hirschuman Index Herfindahl-Hirschuman Index 5.3 7 R 0.14 1 1 / 1 / / Panel1 Panel2 Panel1 Panel2 / (-0.964 in Panel1) / (-0.964 in Panel2) t 14

6 Anglo-American (voice) (exit) Allen and Gale(2000) 15

1 8 25000 50 3400 21600 8 1 580 2 39 2 2 1 580 8 Primark Piranha Financial Information Services (FIS) 100 23000 3400 10-15 16

[1] 2000. [2] 2000 [3] 1998 [4] 1995 [5] 2001 [6] 1996 [7] 1999 [8] 1997 [9] 1999. [10] Allen, F. and Gale, D.(2000) Corporate Governance and Competition in Vives, X.(ed)(2000) Corporate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [11] Bartelsman, E., and Doms, M. (2000) Understanding Productivity: Lessons fromlongitudinal Microdata, Journal of Economic Literature, 38, pp.569-594. [12] Berle, A. Jr. and Means, G.(1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Chicago: Commerce Clearing House. [13] Blundell, R., Bond, S., Devereux, M., and Schiantarelli, F.(1992) Investment and Tobin s Q, Journal of Econometrics, 51, pp.233-257. [14] Blundell, R., Bond,S., and Meghir,C.(1996) Econometric Models of Company Investment, in Matyas. L., and Sevestre,P.(eds) (1996) The Econometrics of Panel Data, 2nd Revised ed, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 17

[15] Blundell, R., Griffith, R., and Reenen, J. van. (1999) Market Share,Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms, Review of Economic Studies, 66, pp.529-554 [16] Bond, S., and Meghir, C. (1994) Dynamic Investment Models and the Firm s Finanical Policy, Review of Economic Studies, 61, pp.197-222. [17] Fama, E.F.(1985) What s different about banks?, Jounral of Monetary Economics, 15, pp.29-35. [18] Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, R.G. and Petersen, B.C. (1988) Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, pp.141-195. [19] Funke, M., Maurer W., and Strulik, H. (1999) Capital Structure and Labour Demand: Investigations Using Gereman Micro Data, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(2), pp.199-215. [20] Greene,W.H.(1997) Frontier Production Functions in Pesaran, M.H. and Schmidt, P.(eds) Handbook of Applied Econometrics, vol. II. Microeconomics, Oxford:Blackwell. [21] Griliches, Zvi., and Mairesse, J. (1998) Production Functions: The Search for Identification in Strom, Steinar (ed) Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [22] Hall, B.H.(1999) Innovation and Market Values, NBER working paper, #6984. [23] Hayashi,F.,and Inoue,T.(1991) The Relation between FirmGrowth and Q with Multiple Capital Goods: Theory and Evidence frompanel Data on Japanese Firms, Econometrica, 59(3), pp.731-753. [24] Hoshi,T., Kashyap, A. and Scharfstein, D.(1991) Corporate Strucutre, Liquidity, and Investment: Evidence from Japanese Industrial Groups, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, pp. 33-60. 18

[25] Jaffe, Adam.(1986) Technological Opportunity and Spillover s of R&D: Evidence fromfirms Patents, Profits and Market Value, American Economic Review 76:984-1001. [26] Jensen, M.C.(1993) The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit and the Failure of Internal Control Systems, Journal of Finance, 48, 831-850. [27] Jorgenson, D. W.(1989) Investment and Growth, in Strom, Steinar (ed) Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [28] Koop, G., Osiewalski, J., and Steel M. F.J. (1999) The Components of Output Growth: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(4), pp.455-487. [29] Kumbhakar, S. C., and Knox Lovell C.A.(2000) Stochasitc Frontier Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [30] Milgrom, P., and Roberts. J. (1992) Economics, Organization and Management, Prentice Hall. [31] Nickell, S.(1986) Dynamic Models of Labour Demand, in Handbook of Labor Economics, vol.1, eds by Ashenfelter, O. and Layard, R., Amsterdam: North Holland. [32] Nickell, S.(1995) The Performance of Companies, Oxford: Blackwell. [33] Nickell, S.(1996) Competition and Corporate Performance, Journal of Political Economy, 104(4), pp.724-746. [34] Nickell, S., Wadhwani, S. and Wall, M.(1992) Productivity growth in U.K. companies, 1975-1986, European Economic Review, 36, pp.1055-1091. [35] Nickell, S., Nicolitsas, D. and Dryden, N.(1997) What makes firms performwell?, European Economic Review, 41, pp.783-796. [36] Nickell, S. and Nicolitsas, D. (1999) How does finanical pressure affect firms?, European Economic Review, 43, pp.1435-56. 19

[37] Shleifer,A. and Vishny, R.(1997) A Survey of Corporate Governance, Jounral of Finance, 52, pp.737-783. [38] Tirole, J. (2001) Corporate Governance, Econometrica, 69(1), pp.1-35. [39] Vives, X.(ed)(2000) Corporate Governance: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 20