ナ畜ナ・カ (窶凖・

Similar documents
ý ý

Maynard Zimmerman Maynard & Zimmerman Maynard & Zimmerman Maynard & Zimmerman

白井学習法(1).ppt

A Study on Interruptions in the Conversations: To Demonstrate the Features of the Conver sation between Japanese Native Speakers and Chinese Japanese

1. interlanguage 1970 (phonology) morphology syntax Hymes 1972 (communicative competence) Interlanguage Pragmatics Blum- Kulka, House, & Kasper, 1989

untitled

untitled

本文/YAZ325T

English for Specific Purposes

transition relevance place, TRP transitions gap overlap Sacks, Schegloff & Jefferson For any turn, at the initial transition-relevance place o



58 1 Labov (1972) narrative (temporal juncture) (narrative clause) narrative Labov (1972) narrative Labov and Waletzkey (1967) narrative q Abstractw O

<論文>英国貴族階級所帯内労働関係における呼称の検証--20世紀前半を時代背景とする映画を分析して

NO95-1_62173.pdf

Grice (1957) S x p S A x 1. A p 2. A S 1 3. A S 1 p (intention-based semantics) S p x (Strawson 1964; Grice 1969; Schiffer 1972; Harman 1974; Bennett

正誤表 グローバル コミュニケーション研究 第 4 号 ( 特別号 ) におきま して 以下の箇所に誤りがございました お詫びして訂正いたします 訂正箇所誤正 34 頁下から 2 行目約 45km 約 450km (2017 年 5 月 )

中学生(英検3級)はALTの修正フィードバックをどの程度知覚するのか

04(....) (..)..

2


18 BS BS BS Equivocation Theory Feldman et al マスメディアの 影 響 力 Lazarsfeld et.al., 1944 Two-Step Flow of

e.g. Kubota 2011 Piller & Takahashi 2006 Kubota 2011 Piller & Takahashi 2006 Kubota 2011 Piller et al Heller 2003 Piller, Takahashi & Watanabe

橡LET.PDF

‰IŠv07_›Z’¶


’V‰K2.ren

Microsoft Word 日本語教育2011

02_加藤氏_4.indd

56 56 The Development of Preschool Children s Views About Conflict Resolution With Peers : Diversity of changes from five-year-olds to six-year-olds Y

社会言語学:その仕組み、展望と社会の中での言葉遣いについて

年少者日本語教育における「学び」の再考

01_31窶愴胆1窶窶ー窶慊イfiツ。01-16

subsequent reference position Stivers formal Sacks & Schegloff Sacks & Schegloff Ford & Fox Hayashi Fox Schegloff Stivers referential Stivers CallHome

情意要因が英語の読解力と会話力に及ぼす影響-JGSS-2008 のデータから-

TALC Teaching and Language Corpora Wichmann et al. ; Kettemann & Marko ; Burnard & McEnery ; Aston ; Hunston ; Granger et al. ; Tan ; Sinclair ; Aston


The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1984, Vol. 55, No. 3, Effects of self-disclosure on interpersonal attraction Masahiko Nakamura (Department

% 95% 2002, 2004, Dunkel 1986, p.100 1

ナ畜ナ・カ (窶凖・


Thomas Kuhn markedness McCawley (1985)

08教育内容開発コース 2014.indd

Jap. J. of Educ. Psychol., 1985, 33, 295 \306 A STUDY ON EGO IDENTITY IN MIDDLE AGE Yuko OKAMOTO The purposes of this study were to clarify the charac

Harvey, M

Page 1

2012, Japanese Journal of Family Sociology, 24(1): 72-83

null element [...] An element which, in some particular description, is posited as existing at a certain point in a structure even though there is no

パーソナリティ研究 2005 第13巻 第2号 170–182

表紙_目次.PDF

tikeya[at]shoin.ac.jp The Function of Quotation Form -tte as Sentence-final Particle Tomoko IKEYA Kobe Shoin Women s University Institute of Linguisti

NINJAL Research Papers No.14

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1990, Vol. 61, No. 3, The effects of a recipient's openness and conveyance to a third party of the self-dis

本文2/YA1307Z

立命館大学人文科学研究所紀要 №87


/ p p

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1974, Vol. 44, No. 6, AN ANALYSIS OF WORD ATTRIBUTES IMAGERY, CONCRETENESS, MEANINGFULNESS AND EASE OF LEAR


201/扉

英語による自己表現学習に関する授業比較 IRF 構造に着目した教室談話分析 教育内容開発コース 藤 森 千 尋 A Comparative Study on the Learning of Self-Expression in English Classrooms : A Classroom Dis

2016

201609発達・教育臨床論コース

Microsoft Word - 英文ビジネスメールに表れる文化特性.doc

AMJ ASQ (Gibbert, Ruigrok, & Wicki, 2008) Eisenhardt (1989) Eisenhardt 2. Eisenhardt (1989) 2.1. Eisenhardt (1989) Eisenhardt (1989) 2.2. Eisenhardt (

企業考動報告書2010 JR西日本 CSRレポート

, , % :

”Лï‡Æ™²“¸_‚æ4“ƒ__‘dflÅPDF‘‚‡«‘o‡µ.pdf

‰gficŒõ/’ÓŠ¹


(’Ó)”R

学術フロンティア推進事業プロジェクト研究シリーズ 12

Ellis 1970 Oxford (1990) SILL(Strategy Inventory for Language Learning) (Rubin, 1975; Naiman, Fröhlich, Stern, & Todesco, 1978)Rubin(1975) verbal-repo

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

1,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Christian Henriot, Little Japan in Shanghai: An Insulated Community,, Robert Bickers and Christian H

33 (2016), 105 Abstract Keywords CAP Vol. 9 ( ) pp : : : :

matsuda.dvi

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

SH (2004)GSE GSE SH GSESH GSE SHGSE SHGSE II A Y T J W (1) 103

Jpn. J. Personality 18(2): (2009)

28 Drucker,1999: Davenport,2005: Frorida, 2005 Arthur and Rousseau (1996) Boundaryless Career Hall (2002) Protean Career 14

Juntendo Medical Journal

Walter et al. 2009: 1 Helleiner 1994 Strange 1971: Gilpin 1987: -65 Strange b, 1998c,

THINKPAD X1 LENOVO ENHANCED EXPERIENCE 2.0

<30362D906C95B638312D9B9A9271E7E92D93FA967B8CEA8A778F4B8ED282CC91E693F18CBE8CEA8F4B93BE82C68A778F4B B2E706466>


untitled

はじめに


indd

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

pp

_01野口.indd

28_04_斎藤正章.indd

Mizuki Kaneda and Naoyuki Osaka (Kyoto University) The Japanese Journal of Psychology 2007, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp

untitled

Core Ethics Vol. Nerriere D.Hon EU GS NPO GS GS Oklahoma State University Kyoto Branch OSU-K OSU-K OSU-K

2 251 Barrera, 1986; Barrera, e.g., Gottlieb, 1985 Wethington & Kessler 1986 r Cohen & Wills,


Cognitive Studies, 22(1), (March 2015) Conversational interactions contribute not only to the sharing of information and establishment of cons

Transcription:

15, 2005 11 * : (IR ) 1. * IWATA Natsuho: [ 135 ]

136 (symmetry) (asymmetry) 1 (Sacks 1972a, b) ( 1995) 2. 2 1. NS-NNS (native speaker, NS) (non-native speaker, NNS) NS (Beebe & Giles 1984; Fan 1992; Gaies 1982; van Lier & Matsuo 2000) NS NNS Fan (1992) NS NS 1 joint construction co-construction (Linell 1998: 86) collaboration ( 2004) collaboration

137 NS NNS NNS NS NNS NS (1999) NNS NS (p. 80) NS NS NNS NS NNS (1999) NS NNS NS 2 2. NS 2 (Linell, Gustavsson & Juvonen 1988; Marková & Linell 1996) (local) (global) (Linell 1990; Linell & Luckmann 1991) (dominance) (inequality) (equality) Linell (1990) Linell & Luckmann (1991) 2 NNS NS (Woken & Swales 1989) (Zuengler 1989; Zuengler & Bent 1991) NS

138 (symmetry) (asymmetry) 3. 3. Linell et al. (1988) (Initiative-Response analysis IR ) Linell et al. (1988) Linell (1998) IR (pointforward) (1) ( ) (2) (Linell et al. 1988: 417) (point-backwards) (marked) () 4 (1) (2) 3 (3) (4) 4 4 3 (Linell et al. 1988) (Linell 1998: 171) 4 4 ( 6 )

139 Linell et al. (1988) 18 19 5 6 6 1 6 4. NS NNS 5 Linell et al. (1988) 18 1 (7.*) 1. 2. ( ) 3. 4. ( ) 5. ( ) ( 1 ) > () ( 2 ) ( ) ( 3 ) <> () ( 4 ) < ( ) ( 5 ) < ( 6 ) > () ( 7 ) ( ) ( 8 ) < ( 9 ) => () (10) = ( ) (11) <=> () (12) <= ( ) (13) : > (14) : ( ) (15) (16) > 6. (17) (> (18) >) 7.* (19) = > Linell et al. (1988: 439 440) 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

140 2 (1) NS NNS (2) 5. 5 1. ( : ) ( : ) 10 1 1 ( ) 20 9 10 (Maynard & Zimmerman, 1984) ( & 2000 ) 2003 7 2 9 5 (NNS NS ) (NNS ) IR 7 7 (10 ) 2 81%

141 2 [ = ( ) (.)(..) ::? hhh hhh ( ) (1999) NNS-NS NNS-NS NNS NNS-NS 5 2. (1) 200 50 IR

142 (2) (1995) (Sacks 1972a, b) ( ) (1995) (2) 6. 6 1. 1 2 200 IR 8 2 3 4 2 ( ) 8

143 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 (1 100 ) 2 (101 196 ) 4 ( ) 3 3 4 2 3 4 6 2. 50 (1) 1 50 3 50 ( S) ( L) 1 20 15 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 1 50 1 20L: [ :: [ :: :: [ : (.) (.) 21S: [ :::! [ [ :::: 22L: 23S: :::.h(.) :: (.) (.) 24L: 25S: : : [(.) 26L: hhh [ :::::::::: : : = :: :: (.) :: :: 27S: : : :::

144 28L: ::::: (3) :: (..) : (.) GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG 13 GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG ( ) 42L: :: : (2) h: 43S: ::: (.).h : (4).h :: :.h :: (.) (..) 23S ( 2003) (43S) 3 NS NNS (2) 51 100 4 1 23S ( 2)( 3) 20 15 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 51 100 2 79L: ( ) :: : [ 80S: [ :: (1) ::::: :: [ 81L: [ ::: (2) (.)

145 82S: h hhh 83L: h h hhh hhhh 84S: [ : 85L: [ 80S 81L (82S) (83L) 82S 3 ( ) (3) 101 150 ( 5) 2, 3, 4 3 20 15 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 101 150 3 101L: 102S: ( ::: b : ) [ :: 103L: [ :(..) 104S: 105L: d :: :: :: 106S: [ 107L: [ hhhh :hhhh hhh 3 102S ( ) (104S) 105L

146 4 4 119L: [ 120S: [ [ :(.) 121L: [ :: hhhhhh 122S: hh (.)# ::(.) 121L 122S 5 5 130S: : JJ ( ) h 131L: 132S: 133L: JJ :: (.) [ 134S: [ h h.h [ 135L: hh [ h hh.hh 130S JJ 133L 134S JJ (135L) 135L

147 (Svennevig 1999) (Edelsky 1997: 196) (4) 151 196 6 3 6 6 153S: 154L: : [: 155S: [ : 156L: (..)? 157S: Ghost house 158L: :::: :: : (.) 157S: hhh 159L: 160S: ::: [ 161L: 162S: [ (.) :: 153S 154L 160S (161L) (162S) 154L 155S 20 15 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 151 196

148 7. (1) (2) (1) (2) (3) (Maynard & Zimmerman 1984) NNS

149 8. NS NNS NS NNS NS NS IR IR 9 IR 1 6 (Itakura 2001) Linell et al. (1988) 9

150 Marková & Linell (1996) (Act-activity interdependence) 2004 (2004) Vol. 23, 36 50. (2003) 13, 1 18. (1995) Vol. 24 (11), 105 109. (1999) 47, 490 500. (2000) 1999 1 4, 55 65,. (1999),. Beebe, L. M. & Giles, H. (1984) Speech-accommodation theories: a discussion in terms of second language acquisition, International Journal of Social Language, Vol. 46: 5 32. Edelsky, C. (1993) Who s got the floor?, In D. Tannen (ed.), Gender and Conversational Interaction, New York, Oxford University Press: 189 227. Fan, S. K. (1992) Language management in contact situations between Japanese and Chinese, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Japanese Studies, Monash University, Australia. Gaies, S. J. (1982) Modification of discourse between native and nonnative speaker peers, Papers 16th Annual TESOL Conference: 1 32 Itakura, H. (2001) Conversational dominance and gender: A study of Japanese speakers in first and

151 second language contexts, Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company. Linell, P. (1990) The power of dialogue dynamics, In I. Marková and K. Foppa (eds.), The Dynamics of Dialogue, New York, Harvester Wheatsheaf: 147 177. (1998) Approaching dialogue, Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company. Linell, P., Gustavsson, L. & Juvonen, P. (1988) Interactional dominance in dyadic communication: a presentation of initiative-response analysis, Linguistics, Vol. 26: 415 442. Linell, P. & Luckmann, T. (1991) Asymmetries in dialogue: some conceptual preliminaries, In I. Marková and K. Foppa (eds.), Asymmetries in Dialogue, New York, Harvester Wheatsheaf: 1 20. Marková, I. & Linell, P. (1996) Coding elementary contributions to dialogue: individual acts versus dialogical interactions, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Vol. 26 (4): 353 373. Maynard, D. W. & Zimmerman, D. H. (1984) Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships, Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 47 (4): 301 316. Sacks, H. (1972a) An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology, In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction: 31 74. ( :,, 1989: 93 173.) (1972b) On the analyzability of stories by children, In J.J.Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston: 325 345. Svennevig, J. (1999) Getting acquainted in Conversation: A study of initial interaction, Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company. van Lier, L. & Matsuo, N. (2000) Varieties of conversational experience: looking for learning opportunities, Applied Language Learning, Vol. 11 (2): 265 287. Woken, M. D. & Swales, J. (1989) Expertise and authority in native-non-native conversations: the need for a variable account, In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, and L. Selinker (eds.), Variation in Second Language Acquisition: Discourse and Pragmatics, Clevedon, Multilingual Matters: 228 244. Zuengler, J. (1989) Performance variation in NS-NNS interactions: ethnolinguistic difference, or discourse domain? In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, and L. Selinker (eds.), Variation in Second Language Acquisition: Discourse and Pragmatics, Multilingual Matters: 228 244. Zuengler, J. & Bent, B. (1991) Relating knowledge of content domain: an influence on native-non native conversations, Applied Linguistics, Vol. 12 (4): 397 415.