untitled

Similar documents
デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

野村資本市場研究所|アジアの金融競争力(PDF)

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

18lacs.dvi


Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1

アロー『やってみて学習』から学習:経済成長にとっての教訓 Learning from `Learning by Doing': Lessons for Economic Growth

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom


財政のサステナビリティと長期金利の動向

産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

(Information Technology )

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

untitled

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ

,,,

本組/pdf納品用_表1~4

表紙_目次.PDF

_16_.indd

ディスクロージャーの実効性確保

資源紛争概念の再検討

untitled

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL

中国引き締め策の対外的影響

Law and Economics Review vol.4,no.1(february 2009) 1998

untitled

Ishi

橡motonishi.PDF

untitled

1990年代以降の日本の経済変動

【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背

日本の教育経済学:実証分析の展望と課題.pdf

国際学研究 2‐1☆/目次(2‐1)

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

bottleneckjapanese.dvi

2 / 24

07-245_25.indd

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─


デフレの定義(最新版).PDF

商学 63‐3☆/6.山本

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)

日本は今なお熟練労働集約的な財を純輸出しているか?


物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―

Winter 2009 No Lower Earnings Limit

[1964] [1957] Core Peripheral 7 Mangan,John[2000] [1999] [1999]pp7-8 5 [1964]p89 6 Doeringer and

和RIM28_向山氏.indd


情報化社会に関する全国調査中間報告書

開発金融増刊号

橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

PDFŠpŒ{Ł¶

†sŸ_Ł¶†t„µŠlŁª(P2†`P24)/‘ã−C”s‡É‡¨‡¯‡éfiñ‘dŸJfiŁ”s‘ê‡Ì”À‘Ø„¤‰ƒ


濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

<90AD8DF489C88A D322E696E6462>

国際文化20号.indd

untitled

untitled

1 1 1 [2000]

日本における財政政策のインパクトー1990年代のイベント・スタディー

03.™ƒ−ÔŁñ“’

国際流動性に関する財政的側面について

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

M&A の経済分析:M&A はなぜ増加したのか

59-1・2 鳥居昭夫・春日教測 .pwd

448 Vol. 44 No 図

, 3, 1999, 4,,

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85

American rule of dismissal Jun'ichi Miyasaka -1-

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)


possibilism Development Projects Observed 5

日本内科学会雑誌第102巻第4号

19世紀の物価動向―コンドラチェフによる物価長波の検討を通じて―*

* 積極的労働市場政策と若年雇用 山本勲野原快太 DD DD


導入

OSIPP40_p1_2.eps

32 constructivism Rawls 1971, pp. 137, 158 Rawls 1971, pp Dworkin 2000, p Cohen 1989, p. 931 option luck neutralization Dworkin 200

2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1

121

1: 合計特殊出生率 出生率の推移 暦年 アメリカドイツフランス スウェーデン日本 Apps and Re

2016 (8) Variety Expansion Effects by Feenstra (1994) 1 Variety Effects Dixit and Stiglitz (1977) CES n n? n t U t = ( nt i=1 σ > 1, a it > 0,


財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

RIETI Highlight VOL.25

GJG160842_O.QXD

New Public Management NPM Walsh Leibenstein, H. X Leibenstein1966 Leibenstein1969 X X X X Blois ue

第2章 経済成長と所得分配: マレーシアの事例を中心に

PFI

Transcription:

2009 6 2

2 1 2 3 4 law enforcement 1. 1.1. 4 Botero et al. [2004] World Bank [1995]

severance pay 1.2.

1 1 [2004] [2007] 1 [2006] [2008] [2008]

2. 2.1. Lazear [1990] 2 employment-at-will doctrine statute law 1970 common law 1 implied-contract exception 2 public policy exception 3 good-faith exception 3 unjust-dismissal legislation wrongful-discharge law Krueger [1991] Autor, Donohue and Schwab [2004, 2006] MacLeod and Nakavachara [2007] 2 Botero et al. [2004] legal origin Botero et al. [2004] Botero et al. [2004] 3

Dertouzos and Karloy [1992] DK [1992] Miles [2000] DK [1992] Autor, Donohue and Schwab [2006] ADS [2006] DK [1992] Miles [2000] ADS [2006] 14 64 0.8 1.7 3 3 Autor, Donohue and Schwab [2004] 3 DK [1992] DK [1992] two-stage least squares: 2SLS 2SLS 4 ADS [2006] DK [1992] 3 1978 1990 24 13~36 2 3 60~84 6 7 ADS [2006] 4 4 Autor, Donohue and Schwab [2004] DK [1992] exclusion restriction DK [1992] 2SLS 3 1 2 1 2 1 fitted value 2 3

ADS [2006] Miles [2000] ADS [2006] Miles [2000] Walsh and Schwarz [1996] 5 Miles [2000] ADS [2006] ADS [2006] 2.2. 3 6 5 3 50 Miles [2000] ADS [2006] 150 28 16 11 Autor, Donohue and Schwab [2004] 3 6 difference-in-difference Besley and Burgess [2004]

right-to-work law Holmes [1998] 4 3. 3.1. 1947 1947 Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 100

50 100 [2003: 218-21] 10 20 10 20 7 8 3.2. Besley and Burgess [2004] 1947 9 Besley and Burgess [2004] 7 8 [2003] Sundar [2005] Sharma [2006] 9 1976 1982 Fallon and Lucas [1993]

1 2 Besley and Burgess [2004] pro-worker pro-employer r st 1958 92 s t 1 y st = s + βt + μ rs, t 1 α + X γ + ε st st 2 1 ˆ μ < 0 ˆ μ > 0 Besley and Burgess [2004] 1 1 10-18 1 1 4

1990 28 27 1990 24 23 1 8-9 2 Besley and Burgess [2004] 50 100 10 20 10 20 Factories Act, 1948 2 10 Besley and Burgess [2004] 3.3. Acemoglu, Aghion and Zilibotti [2006] Aghion and Griffith[2005] 11 10 [2003: 188-9] 11 Kambourov [2009]

Aghion et al. [2008] 1951 Industries Development and Regulation Act, 1951 50 100 industrial license 1980 1991 1985 3 3 1 1991 2 1 Aghion et al. [2008] Aghion et al. [2008] i s t 2 y ist = α + β + δ d + μ r + X γ + ε is t it st ist ist 3 y ist = α + β + η + θ ( d r ) + X γ + ε is st it it st ist ist dit t i 2 δ 3 θ Aghion et al. [2008] ˆ θ < 0 1 5-6 Aghion et al. [2006]

Besley and Burgess [2004] Aghion et al. [2008] 3.4. Besley and Burgess [2004] Aghion et al. [2008] Sinha [2005] Sinha [2005] Sinha [2005: 63-72] 2 Letter of Intent

choice points porous legislative intentions administrative rules Sinha [2005] Besley and Burgess [2004] 1 1 1 y st = s + βt + μ rs, t 1 α + X γ + δ t + ε st s st 1 5 1 1 4 Sinha [2005] Aghion et al. [2008]

Aghion et al. [2008] 4. Botero et al. [2004] 12 Botero et al. [2004] 3 13 Botero et al. [2004] 15 64 2 1 2 14 Botero et al. [2004] 2 3 2 12 http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/shleifer/dataset 2009 3 3 13 Botero et al. [2004: 1346-64] 14 2 3 2 3

2 4 2 1 3 2 5 8 78 1 GDP 3 47 15 Botero et al. [2004] 20 24 3 2 52 1 GDP 3 31 1 GDP 3 16 Botero et al. [2004] 15 1 GDP 16 1 GDP 3 31 1 GDP 2 15 1 GDP 3 47

Caballero, Cowan, Engel and Micco [2004] 3 1947 1992 1 1997 8 5 87 128 21 39 [2003: 224-5] [2003: 227-30] Autor, Donohue and Schwab [2006] MacLeod and Nakavachara [2007]

Munshi and Rosenzweig [2006] [2004] [2008] 572 2 3 108-19 [2008] 572 2 3 75-92 [2003] [2006] [2007] No.29 Acemoglu, Daron, Philippe Aghion and Fabrizio Zilibotti [2006] Distance to Frontier, Selection and Economic Growth, Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(1), pp.37-74. Aghion, Philippe, Robin Burgess, Stephan Redding and Fabrizio Zilibotti [2006] The Unequalizing Effect of Liberalization: Evidence from Dismantling the License Raj in India, NBER Working Paper 12031.

[2008] The Unequalizing Effect of Liberalization: Evidence from Dismantling the License Raj in India, American Economic Review, 98(4), pp.1397-412. Aghion, Philippe and Rachel Griffith [2005] Competition and Growth, Cambridge University Press: MIT Press. Autor, David H. [2003] Outsourcing at Will: The Contribution of Unjust Dismissal Doctrine to the Growth of Employment Outsourcing, Journal of Labor Economics, 21(1), pp.1-42. Autor, David H., John J. Donohue and Stewart J. Schwab [2004] The Employment Consequences of Wrongful-Discharge Laws: Large, Small or None at All? American Economic Review, 94(2), pp.440-6. [2006] The Cost of Wrongful-Discharge Laws, Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(2), pp.211-31. Autor, David H., William R. Kerr and Adriana D. Kugler [2007] Does Employment Protection Reduce Productivity? Evidence from US States, Economic Journal, 117, pp.f189-217. Besley, Timothy and Robin Burgess [2004] Can Labor Regulation Hinder Economic Performance? Evidence from India, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), pp. 91-134. Botero, Juan C., Simeon Djankov, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes and Andrei Shleifer [2004] The Regulation of Labor, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(4), pp.1139-82. Caballero, Richard J., Kevin N. Cowan, Eduardo M. R. A. Engel and Alejandro Micco [2004] Effective Labor Regulation and Microeconomic Flexibility, NBER Working Paper 10744. Dertouzos, James N. and Lynn A. Karloy [1992] Labor-Market Responses to Employer Liability, Santa Monica: Rand. Fallon, Peter R. and Robert E. B. Lucas [1993] Job Security Regulations and the Dynamic Demand for Industrial Labor in India and Zimbabwe, Journal of Development Economics, 40, pp. 241-75. Heckman, James J. and Carmen Páges (eds.) [2004] Law and Employment: Lessons from Latin America and the Caribbean, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Holmes, Thomas J. [1998] The Effect of State Policies on the Location of Manufacturing: Evidence from State Borders, Journal of Political Economy, 106(4), pp.667-705. Kambourov, Gueorgui [2009] Labor Market Regulations and the Sectoral Reallocation

of Workers: The Case of Trade Reforms, Review of Economic Studies, forthcoming. Krueger, Alan [1991] The Evolution of Unjust-Dismissal Legislation in the United States, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44(4) pp.644-60. Lazear, Edward P. [1990] Job Security Provisions and Employment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(3), pp.699-726. MacLeod, Bentley W. and Voraprapa Nakavachara [2007] Can Wrongful Discharge Law Enhance Employment? Economic Journal, 117, F218-78. Miles, Thomas J. [2000] Common Law Exceptions to Employment at Will and U.S. Labor Markets, Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations, 16(1), pp.74-101. Munshi, Kaivan and Mark Rosenzweig [2006] Traditional Institutions Meet the Modern World: Caste, Gender and Schooling Choice in a Globalizing Economy, American Economic Review, 96(4), pp. 1225-1252. Petrin, Amil and Jagadeesh Sivadasan [2006] Job Security Does Affect Economic Efficiency: Theory, A New Statistics and Evidence from Chile, Mimeograph, University of Minnesota. Sinha, Aseema [2005] The Regional Roots of Developmental Politics in India: A Divided Leviathan. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Sharma, Alakh N. [2006] Flexibility, Employment and Labor Market Reforms in India, Economic and Political Weekly, 41(21), pp.2078-85. Sundar, Shyam K. R. [2005] Labor Flexibility Debate: A Comprehensive Review and Some Suggestions, Economic and Political Weekly, 40(22 23), pp.2274-85. Walsh, David J. and Joshua L. Schwarz [1996] State Common Law Wrongful-Discharge Doctrines: Up-Date, Refinement and Rationales, American Business Law Journal, 33(3), pp.645-89. World Bank [1995] World Development Report 1995: Workers in an Integrating World, New York: Oxford University Press.

Besley and Burgess [2004] OLS OLS OLS OLS OLS (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) -0.186-0.185-0.104-0.105 0.0002 (0.064) (0.051) (0.0 39) (0.041) (0.020) 0.240 0.1 84 0.208 0.241 (0.128) (0.1 19) (0.123) (0.106) 0.089 0.0 82 0.053 0.023 (0.061) (0.0 54) (0.044) (0.033) 0.720 0.310 0.629-1.419 (0.960) (1.1 92) (1.189) (2.326) 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.95 508 491 491 459 491

15 64 1990 1994 OLS OLS OLS OLS OLS OLS OLS OLS (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) -6.187-4.099-2.039-2.271-1.389 0.039 (1.815) (2.102) (2.164) (2.697) (2.813) (2.826) -9.470-6.701-6.445-5.934-5.389-3.194 (2.527) (2.851) (2.923) (3.90) (4.055) (3.892) -0.714-0.678-0.685-0.384-1.072-1.00-0.985-0.667 (0.152) (0.147) (0.151) (0.191) (0.170) (0.187) (0.192) (0.231) 0.30 0.31 0.33 0.38 0.45 0.47 0.47 0.54 78 78 78 78 47 47 47 47

20 24 1991 2000 OLS OLS OLS OLS OLS OLS OLS OLS (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) 14.632 13.769 9.780 14.543 13.633 12.716 (4.458) (4.463) (4.658) (7.349) (6.747) (7.236) 11.437 2.608 3.626 9.769 4.114 1.981 (6.678) (6.039) (5.554) (12.010) (10.898) (11.846) -0.044-0.102-0.039-0.131 0.668 0.665 0.614 0.702 (0.433 (0.437) (0.437) (0.448) (0.671) (0.747) (0.762) (0.771) 0.13 0.04 0.14 0.20 0.13 0.07 0.13 0.18 52 52 52 52 31 31 31 31